Editorial

JS bodies breaking rules

Indifference to parliamentary democracy appalling
Let's try to analyse this -- none of the 39 parliamentary standing committees on as many ministries have held regulation number of meetings required under the rules of procedure. These committees are supposed to be crucial in ensuring accountability and transparency of the government, but they have obviously under-performed, not to mention the opposition's keeping from committee work since their formation last July. In fact some of the committees were as late as six months in holding their inaugural meeting. The reasons, rather excuses are galore -- let's not get into them, but committees on important ministries like foreign affairs, planning, commerce, information, labour and above all law and parliamentary affairs itself failed to adhere to the stipulated schedules.

First of all, the Speaker's indifference to the situation is puzzling. We don't know why he, with the powers vested in him, did not intervene to set things right. Then the unconcern of the chairmen of some committees about bending rules sounded disquieting. Such nonchalance cannot help parliamentary democracy. As it is, with the absence of the main opposition in the House and the frequent quorum crisis in it, the functioning of the parliament has already been weakened. Now the apathy towards the standing committees only shows the lack of respect and commitment for parliamentary democracy by our political parties.

The committees were formed without the inclusion of members from the main opposition Awami League since the ruling and the opposition couldn't see eye to eye on the question of proportionate representation in the committees as demanded by the opposition.

That actually caused a long delay in the formation of such important bodies. If the opposition were given the chairmanship of oversight bodies -- for example, public accounts committee, public undertaking committee etc. then perhaps the crisis could be overcome.