Women's representation
All this is a slight improvement upon the past dispensation, which is essentially subjective, cosmetic and apologetic in nature having nothing to do with any objective improvement of the women's political representation at the highest possible level. This is virtually maintaining status quo. As a matter of fact, in terms of the expectations raised in the backdrop of an opportunity presenting itself for legislating an entirely new dispensation, this is a big disappointment.
We have been consistently in favour of direct election to the women's seats. Unfortunately, a disingenuous argument to the effect that it involved a fresh exercise in delimitation of constituencies for women stood in the way of adopting the direct election method. The continuation of the old system, even with a slender embellishment, means that the women members would be handpicked by political parties as opposed to being elected by people.
The nominated women MPs had virtually no role to play except for helping in government formation, or raising the decibel of the ruling party's voice in the parliament as yes persons. It neither gave dignity nor power to the women.
The 14th amendment has failed to meet the aspirations of women for political empowerment which has been so persistently and legitimately articulated by women activist groups and endorsed by civil society leaders including the independent media.
Sooner a further amendment to the law is made the better.
Comments