Editorial

Overdue uniform grading system

Its time-bound introduction needed now
We are heartened by the fact that as many as 75 vice-chancellors of universities, both public and private, have agreed, in principle, to implement the University Grant Commission (UGC)'s recommendations for introduction of a uniform grading system. The marks upon which grades are based differ from university to university. For instance, the marks that win A+ grade for a student in a particular university would simply make A grade in another university. The same happens down the ladder. The net result of the differentiated marking is that students of similar merit are being evaluated differently in the job market and in terms of accessing higher education overseas. Not only are the students subjected to different marking systems, the exam results too are published in different ways. The upshot of all this is discrimination in the name of so-called independent marking systems.

The confusing grading systems sent a wrong signal to overseas university authorities about our standard of higher education itself, although in our view, marking system and standard of education are not one and the same thing. But it is understandable that in determining equivalence between degrees, foreign universities may be confused by the different markings. Our students could be at a disadvantage and sometimes they are. Even for the sake of the local corporate job market, it is highly essential that there is uniformity in the grading system.

Let's face it, even after uniformity is established in the grading system, we would still have the big agenda of bringing uniformity in the academic standards.

The UGC draft proposal has an important recommendation for having an "external examiner" evaluate the examination script to which some VCs have had objections on the ground that it might create sessions jam. The nine-tier grading system has evoked some criticism as well. They are yet to decide on the timing of the introduction. The academic councils of different universities will now submit their draft proposals vis-a-vis the UGC's set of recommendations. It's encouraging for all stakeholders that a consultative method has been adopted to arrive at a consensus on these issues. We would urge them to complete the process in good time for the uniform grading system to be introduced in the next academic session.