Return to the dialogue path
Many tended to view the recent exchange of letters as a sign of thawing of ice between the two camps, which, we would still like to believe has the potential of going forward if the leaders of the major political forces can play their cards well with wisdom and flexibility rather than emotion. It is being widely felt that the initiative for dialogue should be given a fair chance as per the norms of a democratic polity. Besides, the reforms issue will have to be resolved before an election can take place fairly and squarely. We cannot but voice our surprise at the deterioration within such a short time of the outlook for a constructive engagement between the two sides, which emanated from the recent exchange of communication.
The government's hardline stance every time a big programme is announced by the opposition alliance only adds up to its record of denial of space to dissent which is a part and parcel of a functioning democracy. In Bangladesh's political history there are examples of organising sit-in programmes by various parties in the opposition including BNP. Moreover, the 14-part alliance had made known that they would stage the sit-in wherever they are intercepted. If that be the case, why must a ban be imposed?
The opposition being resolute on staging the programme with the attitude of 'come what may', and the government insistent on a tough line, the propensity to confrontation has increased and this must be handled with great caution to prevent clashes taking place. We urge restraint from all concerned.
Comments