Editorial

Contempt rule on secretaries

Political intervention has to stop
The contempt rule issued by the Supreme Court (SC) on four secretaries including the principal secretary to the prime minister for not complying with the 12-point directive on separation of the judiciary from the executive reinforces our faith in the authority of the SC at such difficult times in our nation's history. The court has also asked the secretaries to explain within three weeks why contempt proceedings should not be brought against them. It is a common understanding that things have come to such a pass because of deliberate prolongation, based more on excuses and pretext than any acceptable logic, of the process of the separation of judiciary from the executive by the present government. And in the whole charade, senior government servants appeared to have acted in an unexplainable manner that has ultimately earned them the contempt rule.

In fact, the entire nation watched and listened over the last four years what the law minister has been saying before asking for time-extensions to implement the directives of the SC. Initially, he talked positively on the issue of separation. But, towards the end he began to oscillate and then without a blink of an eye he let the nation know that it was not an easy undertaking and could not be completed during the tenure of the present government. So, the question is, where are we on this vital issue of separation of judiciary?

It is of paramount importance that the highest court of the country in discharge of its sacrosanct constitutional responsibilities ensure that its orders are executed. Those defying or ignoring the directives must be made to face the wrath of law. However, a pertinent question that arises from all these is, did the officials act of their own accord or they were dictated to by the political higher-ups.

It is our hope that the court will take due cognizance of the question of political diktat coming into play in this instance. We reiterate our support for the effort of the judiciary for its separation from the executive. We have criticised earlier the delaying tactics of the government and do so even now. The core question is what has the government done during the four years of time extension that it took. Has requisite progress been made? We seriously doubt. And that is where the real contempt lies.