OSDs
An editorial was published in the DS on 31.08.10 on OSDs, containing a few logical arguments in favour of the OSDs which in some ways may console them. The Daily Star deserves thanks for bringing the important issue to the knowledge of the citizens of the country so outspokenly. Outwardly, the arguments are partial and inadequate to describe the predicament of the incumbents. There are some posts of the republic which some people have to fulfil or serve either on pursuance or diktat of the concerned ministry like: Directors/Director Generals (DG) of he Prime Minister's Office (PMO), Deputy Commissioners (DC), Divisional Commissioners, Private Secretaries (PS) to the Ministers or top brass of any government etc. Generally, bureaucrats of capability, knowledge, honesty and repute are chosen or selected for those positions. Though sometimes partisan people also get those honourable positions, thanks to their political tilt, but in most cases honesty, reputation and efficiency are the main considerations for these postings.
But right after the change of any regime those apparently committed civil servants become the first victims of their so called 'lucrative' previous postings and are made OSDs. Without considering their service to the republic, efficiency and reputation as good officers, they are made the scapegoats.
I know a few people who were never involved in any political activity, whatsoever, and they were regarded by their colleagues as outstanding performers. They have been made OSDs.
No government ever tried to understand that getting posting to those positions is not the only criterion for being considered partisan or does not prove their political bias. Does the nation not deserve to be served by efficient, honest and sincere officers ? Are those OSDs only entitled to get their salary at the end of the month without giving any service to the nation at all? Is there anybody to answer these questions?
For all latest news, follow The Daily Star's Google News channel.
Comments