Editorial

AL opts for status quo

Retaining old guards in the leadership is wrong
The opposition Awami League has again been more conservative than dynamic. We are talking about reinstitution of old guards in the party's top ranks of Dhaka city unit, dashing all hopes of young leaders and enthusiasts. Least to say that it wasn't even done in a democratic process. Party chief Sheikh Hasina chose the old faces instead of the young hopefuls with special power vested on her by the councillors. We have always been in favour of fresh blood in the political leadership who would be elected through a proper election. Since losing the general election in 2001, the party needed to purge itself of the discredited elements, especially those with criminal links. And that's why we strongly felt that the party needed a fresh leadership who would invigorate the activists with a new spirit. But it was not meant to be.

Let's explain why we felt that the decision to reinstate both Mohammed Hanif and Mofazzal Hossain Chowdhury Maya as the president and general secretary of Dhaka city office, respectively, was wrong. There is no doubt that Mr. Hanif has been a complete failure as the Mayor of Dhaka City Corporation. In fact, his unpopularity among the voters in the capital is believed to be the reason behind Awami League's dismal performance in the seats of Dhaka area. On the other hand, Mr. Chowdhury, popularly known by nickname Maya, has been a disaster for the party all along. His alleged links with the underworld, the track record of misdeeds of his son -- all have been nothing but disastrous for the party's fortunes.

Therefore retaining both of them in the top rungs of leadership in the party's Dhaka office would further damage its reputation. All the recent rumours that the party had been making efforts to drive out those with bad reputation in order to make way for fresh blood turned out to be just that -- rumours. We think that the failure of AL to bring about a leadership change will not augur well for the party. Most importantly, it shows that however badly one performs, his or her future is safe as long as the 'leader' is happy. This is greatly demoralising for the sincere, honest and devoted workers that AL still has such a large number of.