Editorial

RMG leadership unity before poll

A prudent move to protect interest
With the clouds of an inclement weather hovering, leaders of three BGMEA groups have fielded a common panel to contest the election scheduled for tomorrow in a pragmatic display of solidarity in their ranks. The new incumbents will rule the roost in three rotational slots which, on top of the unity they have forged, is a sprightly reflection of a spirit of accommodation as well. And what a compelling time to forge all these when the post-quota free garments export world is tasking our RMG sector to show its resilience and competitive mettle, let alone the domestic political restiveness casting its own shadow across.

We are greatly heartened, therefore, by these developments that go to address three major concerns dogging the future of the RMG sector on the back of the challenges faced in the post-MFA quota-free regime. First of all, internal unity needed to be ensured to ward off any extraneous divisive interference. Secondly, dissent within a dynamic, export-oriented business community may not be bad in itself, but when stretched to a point of exploitable divisiveness it can be patently self-injurious. Thirdly, a pre-poll unity translated into a common panel participation in the election is a potential insurance for continuity of unified leadership for the advancement of the RMG sector after the polls.

The leaders of the garment sector deserve felicitations on attaining a consensual position to work together going beyond the eight-month presidencies. This is good augury, especially when they have decided to accord priority to rehabilitating the sick units.

Now, the election will have to be a resounding success by virtue of an impressive voter turn-out, without which, to be honest, the consensus reached by the leaders will not be truly vindicated at the electorate level.

While the compromise reached within the RMG sector leadership is an affirmation of their sagacity, we cannot be oblivious of the blatant governmental interference that preceded it in different shapes and forms, something that must be scrupulously avoided in the best professional interest of the garments association.