Editorial

Landmark Kyoto treaty in operation

US must see reason to join it
Even though an incomplete Kyoto Protocol to the self-willed exclusion of the USA, the largest carbon monoxide producer in the world, and Australia, with her wide-ranging coal mines, has taken effect, there is no way we can fail to acknowledge the far-reaching significance of what has come about. There is a framework now in which 141 signatory countries will cooperate to slow down global warming, if not stop it within a foreseeable future.

The world is heating up at a tremendous pace by the holing up of the ozone layer and the warming of the atmosphere and the seas. Whereas the average global temperatures rose by 0.6 C during 1900 to 1990, wreaking havoc with climatic cycles over time, these are even more dreadfully now projected to rise by 11 C by the middle of the century. Only progressive slashing of green house gases could ensure survival of mankind.

Thirty-four industrialised countries by virtue of their ratifying the Kyoto treaty stand committed to cutting green house emissions by 5.2 percent before 2012, but they will be meeting targets set on the basis of their 1990 levels. So, the slash in emissions in real terms would work out to less than 5.2 percent eventually. Yet, this does not detract from the fact that they have taken the first step forward. As for the developing countries, significantly including China and India, the two fastest growing economies in the world today, they will be asked to make commitments in the next phase of Kyoto negotiations beginning later this year.

With the US and Australia opting out of the treaty -- the latter country would be the worst hit by sea surges -- despite their accounting for nearly a third of the world's total greenhouse gas emissions, the Kyoto Protocol is off to a wobbly start. But the detractors must know that economic advancement cannot be sustained; in fact, it might be foredoomed to reverses, if cooperation in matters of environment, a patently trans-border phenomenon, is not forged on a truly global scale. Exclusionary policies have no place there.