Editorial

BSF claims

Investigation proves them wrong
If there is anything worse than spreading falsehood, it is believing in it. Repeated claims with 'specifics' supposedly furnished, which have now turned out to be incorrect, by the BSF chief on alleged ULFA activity in Bangladesh would leave any detached South Asian watcher wondering why such sweeping observations were made in the first place. We, however, know better, now that our paper's investigation into the matter has revealed that the Indian BSF claims are without an iota of truth. It is hard to accept that the BSF believed in such unsubstantiated report and even more, attempted to make all others believe in it. It defies our comprehension that a government functionary was even allowed to go public on a matter that has the potential of unnecessarily souring good neighbourly relations between the two countries.

One would have expected the BSF to doubly verify its claim of ULFA running commercial ventures in Dhaka topped off with maintenance of bank accounts, before making such claims ad nauseum in public.

The fact that every year we are handed down a list of Indian insurgent camps in Bangladesh has obviously become a source of big embarrassment. And, we wonder what benefits could accrue in terms of bilateral goodwill from such unsubstantiated claims by Indian politicians and government functionaries. It would have been much better had proper channels been used to address the 'concerns' rather than going public with claims that can only detract from good bilateral relations which top Indian leaders have been stressing the need for from time to time.

Good neighbourly relations must be rooted in the understanding and appreciation of genuine concerns of neighbours and be based in a climate of mutual trust and confidence.